<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Startup #73 &#8211; Mockupr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://astartupaday.com/2007/07/12/startup-73-mockupr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://astartupaday.com/2007/07/12/startup-73-mockupr/</link>
	<description>Each day I&#039;ll post an idea for a new Web 2.0 startup</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: astartupaday</title>
		<link>http://astartupaday.com/2007/07/12/startup-73-mockupr/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>astartupaday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astartupaday.wordpress.com/2007/07/12/startup-73-mockupr/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on that one - simple.  I&#039;d be willing to give up the ability to output as code if it meant enabling a better UX.  There are definitely some good WYSIWYG web editors that are out there, the focus here would be less on the &quot;web&quot; more on the &quot;design&quot;.  

I dig the idea of having templates based on popular sites.  I actually &quot;borrowed&quot; the top nav bar UI from Digg and the color scheme of Twitter for my last little project http://www.tweetweet.com/

Now that might be an interesting feature - the ability to create a starting template based on core elements of other sites (i.e. fonts from Digg, basic site layout from Facebook, colors from Tipit.to, etc..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on that one &#8211; simple.  I&#8217;d be willing to give up the ability to output as code if it meant enabling a better UX.  There are definitely some good WYSIWYG web editors that are out there, the focus here would be less on the &#8220;web&#8221; more on the &#8220;design&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I dig the idea of having templates based on popular sites.  I actually &#8220;borrowed&#8221; the top nav bar UI from Digg and the color scheme of Twitter for my last little project <a href="http://www.tweetweet.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tweetweet.com/</a></p>
<p>Now that might be an interesting feature &#8211; the ability to create a starting template based on core elements of other sites (i.e. fonts from Digg, basic site layout from Facebook, colors from Tipit.to, etc..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Dowling</title>
		<link>http://astartupaday.com/2007/07/12/startup-73-mockupr/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astartupaday.wordpress.com/2007/07/12/startup-73-mockupr/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea.  Most of the online WYSIWYG builders are bound to templates, so I usually use Yahoo! Sitebuilder to mock things.  That said, you have to download the software, which is a pain.

I like your idea in the sense that it could be super useful for non-designers to be able to show visually what they want a UI to &quot;feel like&quot;.  I would think the key would be making it REALLY simple.  I also think a useful/attractive feature to have early on would be to have modifiable templates based on some popular sites (eBay, MySpace, Yahoo!, digg, whatever) so that non-techie/non-designer types can use what&#039;s familiar to them as a jump off point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea.  Most of the online WYSIWYG builders are bound to templates, so I usually use Yahoo! Sitebuilder to mock things.  That said, you have to download the software, which is a pain.</p>
<p>I like your idea in the sense that it could be super useful for non-designers to be able to show visually what they want a UI to &#8220;feel like&#8221;.  I would think the key would be making it REALLY simple.  I also think a useful/attractive feature to have early on would be to have modifiable templates based on some popular sites (eBay, MySpace, Yahoo!, digg, whatever) so that non-techie/non-designer types can use what&#8217;s familiar to them as a jump off point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
